Your old destination guides can still bring readers in.
Silotree finds the guides nothing links to — the neighbourhood pages five clicks deep, the “when to go” posts written for every city — and suggests links from guides you already wrote. Approve them from a weekly email, about ten minutes a week.
- Free audit, no account
- First 10 links written free
- Undo any batch
destination guides answer “best time to visit” and no page on your site owns the question.
- Missing pageBest time to visit — nothing covers this31 posts mention it · 0 pages about itSearch position —
- CompetesBest time to visit Tokyo/japan/tokyo/ · 3 links inSearch position #12
- CompetesWhen to go to Lisbon/portugal/lisbon/ · 1 link inSearch position #19
- BuriedShibuya at night: a local guide5 clicks from home · 2 links inSearch position #26
The missing page is the finding. Thirty-one posts are ready to link to a “when to go” guide the day you write it, and until then each one answers the question alone.
Ten minutes a week, on posts you already wrote.
- 1
Get a free audit
Paste your address. Silotree reads every post and lists the ones nothing links to — the posts readers and Google rarely reach.
- 2
Approve five links a week
Once a week, the best five suggestions arrive by email: a sentence you already wrote, a phrase in it, and the post it should lead to. Approve or skip.
- 3
We write them in
Press Write and the plugin adds exactly those links. A revision is saved first, and any batch comes out again in one click.
The crawl and the whole map work on any site, but pulling an anchor out of a sentence is language-specific and only English is done today. On a translated travel archive that is a real limitation, and it is the reason to wait.
Your addresses already sort the site by place
Most blogs have to be told what their sections are. A travel archive says it in the URLs — /japan/, /japan/tokyo/, /japan/tokyo/shibuya/ — so the structural half of this is accurate from the first crawl. What crosses it is where the work is: "best time to visit", "what it costs", "getting around" are the same article written for thirty-one destinations, and they belong to each other as much as to their city.
Three things a general linking tool misses here
Thirty-one posts, one question, no page that answers it
Every destination has a "best time to visit" post and no single page covers the subject. That is a topic with no main page, and it is the most common gap this finds — a page you have not written, with thirty-one posts ready to link to it the day it exists.
Name the topic, say it has no main page, and list the thirty-one posts waiting to link into it — which turns a vague sense that something is missing into one page to write.
The deepest pages are the ones that convert
A neighbourhood guide sits four or five clicks from home because the hierarchy is deep, and it is also the page somebody books from. Depth is measured here through links people wrote rather than through the menu, which is closer to how readers actually reach these pages.
Measure depth through links people wrote rather than through the menu, so a neighbourhood guide five clicks down is visible as buried rather than hidden behind a nav that reaches everything.
Half the archive is out of date and nothing says so
Prices, opening times, visa rules. This will not tell you which facts are stale — no linking tool can — but it will tell you which of your falling posts are falling because they lost support and which are falling because the world moved, and only the first is ours to fix.
Split decay by cause. A post that lost its internal support is ours to fix and we say so; a post losing to a better article is yours, and we say that too.
Some slipping guides need rewriting, and we will say so
A guide sliding because a competitor updated theirs is a writing job, not a linking one. This product splits decay by cause precisely so it can tell you that, which means part of what it reports is work it cannot do for you.
Before you run it
Do you handle multiple languages?
Not yet. The crawl and the whole map work on any site, but pulling a usable anchor out of a sentence is language-specific work and only English is done. For a translated travel site that is a real limitation today.
Will it link my old destination guides to new ones automatically?
It proposes them and you approve. When you publish a new guide it asks immediately which older posts should link to it, using phrases those posts already contain — which on a travel archive is usually the destination name.
What about seasonal posts?
Posts slipping are shown with their Search Console numbers, so a ski guide in July is visibly seasonal rather than broken. A year-on-year comparison is on the roadmap; until then the tool shows the data rather than guessing.
You already wrote the guides.
Give them a way to be found.
Free audit with no account. Your first 10 links are written free, and paid plans come with a 30-day money-back guarantee.
Free audit · No account needed · No changes to your site